The apostle Paul worshipers and those who reject parts of scripture

It is sad what I see happening today where people reject parts of scripture believing it does not apply to them.  You have several groups that do this and each of those groups reject different parts of scripture based on their ignorance or being fed the "party line" by various denominations.

Previously I wrote about those who reject the apostle Paul calling him a false apostle because, on the surface, it seems that he contradicted scripture.  I showed this is not the case and to reject Paul, you call into question the entire new testament especially Luke and Peter who affirm Paul in Acts and the books of Peter (1 Peter and 2 Peter) respectively.  The rejecting of Paul also leads to the distrust of Yahweh who would have allowed deception into His scripture.  I accept Paul as an apostle although lie Peter says, I see how his words can be - and have been by most "christians" - twisted to mean something opposite of what he said.  I'll get into this more.

2 Peter 3
14  Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless.
15  And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16  As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
17  Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

In previous posts, I showed how "christians" twist the words of Paul so they can justify their wickedness and falling from their stedfastedness.  Strongs define wickedness as being lawless.  This is a warning to make sure you understand what Paul actually meant in his writings.

There are those who reject anything in the new testament that Yeshua did not say.  These people are called "red letter christians" because in the King James bible, Yeshua's words are in red.  These people accept Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, parts of Acts, and parts of Revelation and reject the rest of the new testament.   Again - those who hold to this belief are rejecting the fact that Yahweh can protect His word.  They are also stating they can believe some of what was written but not everything written by the same author (such as the book of Luke and the other book Luke wrote Acts)

First I need to reiterate what salvation is.  Salvation is the acceptance of Yeshua's atonement for sin by His dying on the cross and rising again three days later to prove He was the unblemished Passover Lamb (meaning He led a sin free life)  We prove that we are His by obeying Him as our Lord and recognizing He is the Savior for what He finished on the cross: the atonement for sin that was only covered by animal sacrifce until He offered Himself as the final atonement for sin as foretold by the prophets in the old testament.

Even when Yeshua walked on the earth 2,000 years ago, most followed Him for what He offered them: Bread, fish, and healings.  Most "christians" today want the benefits of following Him : the escape from hell - but they do not want to follow Him as Lord of their life.

If you worship Messiah Yeshua as Lord then why do you not do what He says?  His sheep know His voice and obey Him yet the apostle Paul worshipers claim "that is for the Jews" and I was even told "Matthew was not written for the gentiles but is for the Jews" when I brought up what Messiah Yeshua - the one they claim to worship - said.

John 10
1  Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.
2  But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.
3  To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.
4  And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.
5  And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.

John 10:9  I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.

John 10:16  And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

Some of these apostle Paul worshipers go as far as to say the doctrine for Christians is ONLY in Romans through Philemon - WOW - This leaves out the four gospels and everything NOT written by Paul (I guess Kenny Jacobs - a Paul worshiper - doesn't think that Paul wrote Hebrews) including the book of Revelation where Messiah Yeshua wrote to the seven churches.

I have previously showed that the Bereans accepted what Paul taught after they compared his teachings with scripture and showed by historical facts that the only scripture that they had was the old testament since the new testament had not been written yet and the new testament was not codified until at least two hundred years later.  Even if they had had Paul's writings and they were considered scripture, they would never use Paul's writings to prove what Paul said just as they would not use anyone's writings as proving someone to be true.  Of course since Kenny Jacobs does not accept the book of Acts, he tosses out the passages where Paul teaches the Jews and gentiles in the Synagogues.  Kenny also throws out the book of 1 John that defines sin as violation of the law, and even rejects Matthew where Messiah Yeshua - the Messiah he claims he worships - states He will reject those who do not obey.  Kenny claims "that is for the Jews" but the Jewish believers obey Torah due to their upbringing before their acceptance of Yeshua as their Messiah -it is the gentiles who "grew up Christian" that rejects the need to obey Yeshua's voice and follow Him as their LORD.  

 1 John 3:4  Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Matthew 7
21  Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.^G458

Strong's number G458 iniquity (transliterated as anomia)   :
anomia
1) the condition of without law
     a) because ignorant of it
     b) because of violating it
2) contempt and violation of law, iniquity, wickedness

The apostle Paul showed this in his writings in Romans - the native branches are in the olive trees which are the Jewish people who know about Torah and obeying Yahweh.  The wild olive branches - the gentiles - are grafted into Yeshua among the native branches.  Both partake of the Root and produce the fruit of the Holy Spirit - the olive oil which is used to represent the Holy Spirit.  Those cut off after partaking of the Root are no longer producing the Fruit of the Spirit - or the olive oil (I've shown how this relates to the parable of the ten virgins before)  Notice that the apostle Paul says if you do not continue in Yahweh's goodness, the wild branches can be cut out of the tree.

Romans 11
16  For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.
17  And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18  Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19  Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in.
20  Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21  For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22  Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23  And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
24  For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
25  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26  And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

I'm not sure how anyone can be a Christian if they claim the apostle Paul's words supercede what the rest of scripture - including what Messiah Yeshua said in His own words - clealy says.  If anything Paul said contradicts scripture, then he is false.  No scripture contradicts any other part of scripture otherwise you are calling all into question if it being true.  The apostle Paul speaks against those who follow him or even those who follow Messiah - that rejects the rest of scripture.  I believe the following is reference to the Paul worshipers, the "red letter only christians", and to those who reject Paul. 

1 Corinthians 1
12  Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13  Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
14  I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
15  Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
16  And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

The writings of Paul are for us today but we need to accept them as He meant them - which means to look at them in the context they were written otherwise they lose their meaning.

I will briefly go over two commonly twisted scriptures (yet again) to show how the context defines the meaning.  I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand since they are very clear to those who want to know the truth.

Romans 14
5  One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
6  He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.

Romans 14:5 is often twisted to "prove" Paul was teaching the Sabbath day can be any day you choose.  I used numerous verses in Acts to disprove this and showed that Paul went to the Synagogues on the Sabbath.  Those like Kenny Jacobs hate the Sabbath so they reject the book of Acts.  The above verses are about the sects of Jews in the first century who taught that a different day was to be the day you fasted and prayed.  Verse 6 makes this clear.  This can be used to show you can worship any day you choose - whether saturday or sunday --- or even monday, tuesday, wednesday, etc.  It still has nothing to do with the Sabbath and observing the Sabbath.  The rebellious and stiff necked love using this verse to justify not observing the Sabbath even though it has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Another verse that is often twisted by Paul worshiping Yahweh rejecting rebels is the one sent to Collose. 

Colossians 2
16  Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
17  Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

The context of the letter is that it was sent to new believers in the pagan city. These new believers had one participated in the pagan feasts and festivals that their friends and family celebrated.  If they had been told by Paul they could continue their pagan feasts and observe whichever day they wanted, the above verses would not have been needed.  What the apostle Paul was telling them was to not let their pagan friends and family judge them because they were now following Yahweh and the days He said to observe.  There can be no other meaning to this when the context of the letter is looked at.  The pagans celebrated full moons - Yahweh's instruction was to observe the new moon.  The pagans did not celebrate the Sabbath so this instruction would not have been needed if they were to continue not observing it.  The next verse clearly shows that Paul was instructing them in Yahweh's commands because the pagan feasts, moons, meats. etc. was not a shadow of things to come in the future but Yahweh's instructions are that shadow of things to come.  To twist this to show it is about something besides Yahweh's instructions is rebellion.

In a few verses earlier, Paul spoke against those who use philosophy and deceit to follow the world and traditions instead of Messiah Yeshua.

Colossians 2:8  Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Romans 7:7  What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Romans 7:12  Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Romans 7:22  For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

When the apostle Paul was on his journeys teaching and writing, the ONLY scripture that existed was the old testament and he wrote that ALL scripture was for doctrine which means OLD TESTAMENT and was not claiming his writings were the only doctrine one needed to obey.  The apostle Paul is showing that those who follow his writings and reject the old testament (which was the only scripture that existed when he wrote this) are liars seducers who are growing worse and deceiving others as well as being deceived themselves.

2 Timothy 3
13  But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
14  But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
15  And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16  All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17  That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

I do not know what else to say about this.  I thought I had covered it thoroughly and documented in scripture and historical fact but it seems people love being deceived and love their rebellion..  Yeshua is the Messiah and if anyone contradicts what He says they are either wrong or they are being misinterpreted.  People that claim the words of Paul are "for the Christians" and what Messiah Yeshua said is "for the Jews and not for Christians" those people are deceived and are deceiving others and they have made Paul into their "god".

This is what Yeshua says to us.  Are you listening to Him or to someone else?

Luke 6
46  And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?
47  Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like:
48  He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock.
49  But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

John 14:15  If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John 14:23  Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

John 15:10  If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

1 John 2
3  And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
4  He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

1 John 5
2  By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.
3  For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.

Revelation 14:12  Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Revelation 12:17  And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. 

False teacher Andy Woods - "pastor" of Sugar Land Bible Church (Sugar Land, TX)

After repeated attempts of trying to contact Andy Woods in regards to his false teachings, I'm posting this so others can be warned against his intentional false teachings of Once Saved Always Saved and how he twists scripture to give those who claim to be believers a false assurance.

Andy Woods (he insists in being called "Dr" due to his PhD - just as the Nicolaitans liked lording the cast system over their underlings) is an unapologetic false teacher that is INTENTIONALLY giving false assurances to the disobedient and rebellious that they will be raptured and INTENTIONALLY twists scripture to "prove" his false Once Saved Always Saved (OSAS) demonic doctrine.  Andy woods is also an attorney (something he makes sure his audience knows) so he KNOWS about rules of evidence and making false accusations against people and he still INTENTIONALLY does so to promote his false doctrines.

Here is one of the prophecy conferences where he taught what I am writing about in this post.  Although you can watch the entire video,  Start the video at 32:55 minutes into his talk to show his false teaching.  The false teaching itself starts at minute 34:50 although starting it earlier you get the full context of this heretical teaching,



35:00 - 35:15   Andy Woods alludes that Lot was backslidden because he sat at the city gate showing that he had some sort of "position of authority"

Does this mean any Christian involved in politics or being the salt and light trying to keep biblical values in their communities (even sodomite affirming cities like San Francisco) are backsliders or compromisers?  Lot may have been using his position trying to bring a sembelence of faith in Yahweh to his community - after all, his daughters were engaged to men in sodom.  To imply Lot was a backslider because he was involved in his community os stating Christians who do so are automatically compromisers.  This is a false accusation against Lot.  In Genesis 14:14-17, Abraham saved Lot and all the people and possessions after they had been captive and the king of sodom went to meet them.  It could be the king had made Lot a judge in sodom in gratitude for this.

35:15 - 35:22 So because Lot offered his virgin daughters instead of the angels to the sodomite crowd apparently makes him a compromiser / backslider?

Lot knew very well that the sodomites would reject his daughters because they were, after all, sodomites and wanted what they believed to be men (the angels)

In the middle east, when visitors are under the roof of the home, the visitors are protected at all costs - even to the cost of the home they are in.  To protect his guests at all cost is what Lot was doing.  Another example of this is when the Levite priest was invited into a home, the home owner gave his own virgin daughter to the townsmen (and the Levite his concubine) to protect the Levite priest. (Judges 19:16-30)

Judges 19
20  And the old man said, Peace be with thee; howsoever let all thy wants lie upon me; only lodge not in the street.
21  So he brought him into his house, and gave provender unto the asses: and they washed their feet, and did eat and drink.
22  Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
23  And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly.
24  Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing.
25  But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go.

Also Woods does not mention the times Abraham allows his wife Sarah to be taken by kings (by claiming she was his sister) in order to save his own neck.  Yahweh stepped in to preserve Sarah from those kings. (Genesis 12 is one account)

35:23-35:00   Woods claims "Lot woke up and got serious about spiritual things" and "his inlaws and relatives "thought he was jesting" and woods goes on to say that Lot had "lost all spiritual credibility" with his family.

Bible does not mention Lot's in-laws in regards to sodom - Lot was married before he went to sodom.  The angels only mentioned a son in law, sons, and daughters.  The only ones who mocked Lot about the impending judgment mentioned were Lot's sons in law.  They were not mocking him for his newfound seriousness of spiritual things as Andy Woods claims.

35:35 - 36:00   Woods goes on to say the Story of Lot ends by Lot having an incestual relationship with his daughters - and was a drunk.  Woods intentionally brings this event up BEFORE speaking about Lot's rescue from sodom even though it happened AFTER it - and Woods was very deceptive and LIED about how the events happened.

The truth is that after Lot and his daughters were safely rescued (Lot's wife had looked back and became a pillar of salt) that Lot's daughters thought they were the only ones left on earth and wanted to preserve the line of their father so they got him drunk (two nights in a row) and each of them had relations with their father (they raped him) and the bible CLEARLY states Lot did not know what they had done to him.   This was NOT an "incestuous relationship" as Andy Woods LIES about - it was two daughters who thought they were the only people left on earth trying to repopulate the earth and each of them having, unknowing to Lot, a one time sexual encounter with their father.  To state this was anything more is an intentinal LIE and is being used to support the OSAS false doctrine as well as giving false assurance that even "carnal" or "backsliding" people who claim to be Crhstians will be raptured.  Andy Woods KNOWS this is a lie and yet he still teaches it.  Also note: this was before The Law was given to Moses to write down and nothing was in the bible against incestuous relationships at this time - in fact, Abraham had married his half sister Sarah.

Genesis 19
31  And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth:
32  Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.
33  And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
34  And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, and lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father.
35  And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
36  Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.
37  And the firstborn bare a son, and called his name Moab: the same is the father of the Moabites unto this day.
38  And the younger, she also bare a son, and called his name Benammi: the same is the father of the children of Ammon unto this day.

Where does this say it was an incestuous relationship?  It was two daughters getting their father drunk and sleeping with him - something he was not aware of happening.  If anything, Lot was a rape victim and is blameless in this.  It was Yahweh's plan, however, since Ruth was a Moabite and she was the mother of Obed, the father of Jesse, the father of King David (and is in the line of Messiah Yeshua)

36:00 -  36:45    Woods said he would not have thought Lot was a believer if the new testament had not called him a righteous man - implying that all the events he claimed happened happened as he had falsely said they happened.  He said this proves that Lot was a "backslidden believer" or a "carnal christian" because "while he was positionally right before God,  his lifestyle did not match it"

36:45-36:59   Woods goes on to say even though Lot "in his carnality" because he was "one of God's people"  had to "be removed before the judgment hit"

37:00- 39:15  Implies because the angel told Lot that he 'could NOT do anything' (as opposed to 'I will not do anything') until Lot was removed.  Woods claims this is because Lot, although "carnal", HAD TO be safe in Zoar before the angel could do anything.

Woods claim that carnal christians have to be safely removed before judgment because the angel COULD NOT do something is making a false assertion that the angel did not have specific instructions to get Lot to safety before he brought the judgment - it was NOT the angels call to bring judgment before Lot ws safe and so the angel was repeating the instruction he had received to Lot.

Woods also conveniently forgets that Abraham had made a bargain with Yahweh over the destruction of sodom (Genesis 18:22-33).  While Abraham thought he had saved the cities because he assumed there had to be ten righteous, his intention was to save Lot and Lot's family so even if Lot was "carnal" or ""backslidden" which scripture contradicts those assertions, Lot would still have been saved for Abraham's sake.  In fact, the bible clearly says Lot was righteous and gives NO indication that Lot was carnal or backslidden as Andy Woods alleges.  In fact, scripture clearly says Lot was vexed in his soul because of sodom's unlawful deeds - Andy Woods has maligned Lot and KNOWINGLY has twisted scripture to fit his demonic agenda of assuring people they do not have to follow Messiah Yeshua to be saved or raptured.

2 Peter 2
7  And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8  (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Messiah Yeshua clearly states that He will reject those who are "doing things for Him" if they are not obeying the father.  So if someone is a "backslider" or "carnal christian" who is not doing things for Him and obviously is not obeying Him - why would they be raptured when Yeshua returns for His followers when Messiah Yeshua will reject them at the judgment???

1 John 3:4  Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Matthew 7
21  Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. ^G458

Strong's number G458 iniquity (transliterated as anomia)   :
anomia
1) the condition of without law
     a) because ignorant of it
     b) because of violating it
2) contempt and violation of law, iniquity, wickedness

John14:15  If ye love me, keep my commandments.

John14:23  Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

John15:10  If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

1 John 2
3  And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
4  He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

1 John 5
2  By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.
3  For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.

Revelation 14:12  Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Revelation 12:17  And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

"pastor" Steven L Anderson : Wolf in sheeps clothing - Heretic that teaches replacement theology and Anti-Semitism

There is a self-proclaimed "pastor" that is popular on facebook as well as youtube.  His followers defend him and his satanic false teachings.  I was, and still may, do a video on him although so many have been done on him already.

"pastor" Steven L. Anderson (of Tempe, AZ) teaches replacement theology and is an anti-semite who has caught the attention of the media as well as the Anti Defamation League (ADL is a watch organization for Antisemiticism)  Anderson has no formal bible training and only reads the KJV bible, no commentaries, and comes up with bizarre doctrines by taking verses out of context and expects his followers to believe what "the man of God" has told them (IE: his teachings)    he is a cult leader and is dangerous.

Steven Anderson has made videos claiming the Jewish people are "not the real Jews" and how all the promises Yahweh gave to Israel Yeshua took those promises and gave them to the church.  This is classic replacement theology.  He is also anti-government and has ties to white supremacy / Christian identity (neo-nazi) groups.  He has stated publicly - and got national attention - when he said he prayed president obama would die and all homosexuals should be executed.  He also made a youtube video calling ML King lucifer.

I have not watched all of his videos (there are TONS / hours and hours) - just enough to prove to myself that he is an anti-semite, he teaches replacement theology, and is a cult leader and people actually follow his teachings.  Most of this (not all) have been exposed by numerous videos and news articles made by others although I have only watched a few of the videos exposing him.    Anderson is so vile and demon filled I can only stomach listening to him for a short time so I'm hoping I will not be led to make a video about him.  He is also a Holocaust denier and claims the Jews are "not really the Jews"

The reason for this post is to bring up something which I had not seen anyone else bring up regarding him (with my limited youtube views)  Anderson was interviewed several times by so-called "pastor" Texe Marrs.  Texe Marrs is infamous in that he teaches the satanic serpent seed doctrine which claims that the Jewish people are physical descendants of Eve and satan (their offspring was Cain according to this satanic teaching)  Texe Marrs has written books on this topic.  I have made a video exposing infamous youtuber 'Hummingbird' and her adherence and teaching of this satanic serent seed doctrine (another infamous youtuber that holds to it is BPEarthwatch)  serpent seed is one of the most vile and heretical forms of replacement theology.

Below is several links regarding Steven L. Anderson and his Anti-Semitic and satanic teachings.  I'm also including a link to a youtube video on 'Hummingbird' for those who are not familiar with this satanic serpent seed teaching:

ADL (Anti Defamation League)
http://blog.adl.org/anti-semitism/anti-semitic-pastor-steve-anderson-new-film

Phoenix New Times
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/steven-anderson-wacko-tempe-pastor-now-in-anti-semitism-business-6651793

More SATANIC Hatred Of The Jews By Steven Andersnake!!!
(Marching To Zion is an Anti-Semitic video made by Steven L. Anderson)
https://youtu.be/H_IDzHWUDpA

Who Is A Jew According To Steven Anderson? 
https://youtu.be/bl39k2ffGZE

Mike Hoggard has also exposed Steven Anderson although I cannot link to his video because I totally disagree with his teaching against Yahweh and Yeshua's Hebrew names and I disagree with his teaching that we are to not observe Torah.  He has also mocked Yahweh and Yeshua's Hebrew names.

Video on serpent seed doctrine  https://youtu.be/uLnSMmHqfq8